LinkedIn Engagement Surge: Women Discover Success When Pretending to be Men
Do your professional networking followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore opportunities?
Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.
The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility
Numerous female professionals participated in an organized professional network test this week after viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.
Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.
Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up
The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who use professional networking terminology.
Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.
Platform Response
In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.
Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.
Individual Results
A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.
"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.
Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decline significantly.
The Process
- First, she changed her gender to "man"
- Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
- Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" language
The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.
The Negative Aspect
Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.
"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."
She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."
Mixed Results
Some participants encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.
"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.
Wider Consequences
These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.
Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.
Technical Explanation
Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.
The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."
Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the platform.
Evolving Environment
As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.
"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."